Developing Feedback Literacy Through Technology-Mediated Feedback in L2 Writing: A Mixed-Methods Approach

Авторы

  • Rakhimova Sabokhat Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15205344

Ключевые слова:

Feedback Literacy, Technology-Mediated Feedback, Second Language Writing (L2 Writing), Mixed-Methods Approach, Feedback Engagement, Peer Feedback, Self-Regulation, Automated Feedback Systems, Learning Management Systems (LMS), Writing Improvement, Educational Technology, Collaborative Writing Tools, Writing Pedagogy.

Аннотация

This article explores how technology can help students improve their skills in using feedback for writing in
a second language (L2). Feedback literacy refers to the ability to understand, interpret, and use feedback to improve
writing, which is crucial for L2 learners. The study employs various technological tools such as automated feedback systems,
learning management systems (LMS), peer review platforms, and collaborative writing tools to support this learning
process. The researchers used both quantitative data (e.g., surveys and test scores) and qualitative data (e.g., interviews
and journals) to analyze how students interact with feedback, how they use it to enhance their writing, and the challenges
they encounter. The findings indicate that technology-mediated feedback fosters greater student engagement, promotes
self-regulation, and encourages collaboration.

Биография автора

  • Rakhimova Sabokhat

    An assistant teacher of Toshkent University of Humanities

Библиографические ссылки

Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Multilingual Matters.

Boggs, J. A. (2019). Effects of teacher-scaffolded and self-scaffolded corrective feedback compared to direct corrective

feedback on grammatical accuracy in English L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 100671.

Boggs, J. A., & Manchón, R. M. (2023). Feedback literacy in writing research and teaching: Advancing L2 WCF

research agendas. Assessing Writing, 58, 100786.

Carless, D. (2015). The role of feedback in developing students’ understanding of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation

in Higher Education, 40(5), 754–766.

Ene, E., & Upton, T. A. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL

composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 1–13.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101.

Liu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education,

(3), 279–290.

Rose, H., Briggs, J. G., Boggs, J. A., Sergio, L., & Ivanova-Slavianskaia, N. (2018). A systematic review of language

learner strategy research in the face of self-regulation. System, 72, 151–163.

Опубликован

2025-03-20

Как цитировать

Developing Feedback Literacy Through Technology-Mediated Feedback in L2 Writing: A Mixed-Methods Approach. (2025). MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15205344

Наиболее читаемые статьи этого автора (авторов)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>