TESKARI SINF MODELI ASOSIDA AMALIY MASHG‘ULOTLARGA TAYYORGARLIKNI TASHKIL ETISH METODIKASINI TAKOMILLASHTIRISH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23683342Аннотация
Maqolada oliy ta’limda teskari sinf modeli asosida amaliy mashg‘ulotlarga tayyorgarlikni tashkil etish metodikasini takomillashtirish masalasi yoritiladi. Ilmiy adabiyotlarni tahlil qilish, qiyoslash va pedagogik modellashtirish asosida mustaqil tayyorgarlik, diagnostika, differensial yordam, auditoriyadagi faoliyat, baholash va refleksiyani birlashtiruvchi metodika taklif etiladi. Qisqa nazariy material, bajarish namunasi, mikrotopshiriq hamda diagnostik savollardan iborat tayyorgarlik paketi tavsiflanadi. Diagnostika natijalariga ko‘ra pedagogik yordamni moslashtirish va amaliy natijalarni mezonlar asosida baholash yondashuvlari bayon qilinadi. Metodikaning qo‘llanishi elektron jadvallarda ma’lumotlarni tahlil qilish mavzusi misolida ko‘rsatiladi. Ish nazariy-metodik xususiyatga ega bo‘lib, taklif etilgan metodikaning samaradorligi kelgusida tajriba-sinov orqali tekshirilishi lozim.Ключевые слова
teskari sinf, amaliy mashg‘ulot, mustaqil tayyorgarlik, pedagogik diagnostika, differensial yordam, faol o‘rganish, mezonli baholash, refleksiyaБиблиографические ссылки
1. Van Alten D. C. D., Phielix C., Janssen J., Kester L. Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. (2019). Educational Research Review. -, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j
2. Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review. -, 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j
3. Ma, Y., Fan, H., & Ning, B. (2025). The effectiveness of the flipped classroom: A second-order meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Research. -, 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102855
4. Van Alten D. C. D., Phielix C., Janssen J., Kester L. Self-regulated learning support in flipped learning videos enhances learning outcomes. (2020). Computers & Education. -, 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j
5. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. -, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
6. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. - Atlanta, Georgia: ASEE. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585
7. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development. -, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
8. Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education. -, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
9. Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. -, 12, 41039–016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2
10. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. -, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 «Maktabgacha va maktab ta’limi» jurnali

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
