BOʻLAJAK BOSHLANGʻICH SINF OʻQITUVCHILARINI TAYYORLASH MAZMUNIDA ARGUMENTATSION NUTQ: DARSLIKLAR, OʻQUV REJA VA OLIY TAʼLIM ADABIYOTINING KONTENT-TAHLILI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23769186Аннотация
Maqolada boshlang‘ich sinf darsliklaridagi argumentativ talablar va bo‘lajak o‘qituvchilarni ushbu talablarni bajarishga tayyorlovchi oliy ta’lim mazmuni o‘rtasidagi muvofiqlik tahlil qilinadi. 2023-yilgi 1–4-sinf darsliklari (29 ta kitob, 6 928 ta topshiriq-gap) argument sifati darajalariga asoslangan sxema bo‘yicha, 60110500 – Boshlang‘ich ta’lim yo‘na lishining me’yoriy hujjatlari va to‘qqizta o‘quv nashri esa 13 ta ko‘rsatkich hamda atamalar chastotasi tahlili orqali o‘rganildi. Topshiriqlarning 2,9 foizi argumentativ, 0,42 foizi esa qat’iy ma’noda argumentativ ekani, oliy ta’limda argumentatsiya alohida kompetensiya sifatida belgilanmagani aniqlandi. Topshiriqlarning argumentativ darajasini oshirish algoritmi taklif etildi.Ключевые слова
argumentativ nutq, bo‘lajak boshlang‘ich sinf o‘qituvchisi, kontent-tahlil, darslik topshirig‘i, malaka talablariБиблиографические ссылки
1. Rapanta, C. (2024). Argument-based teaching: A necessary 21st-century pedagogical practice. Educação, Sociedade & Culturas, (67), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24840/esc.vi67.741
2. Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic Argumentation as a Vehicle for Developing Young Adolescents’ Thinking. Psychological Science, 22(4), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611402512
3. Mullis, I. V. S., von Davier, M., Foy, P., Fishbein, B., Reynolds, K. A., & Wry, E. (2021). PIRLS 2021 International Results in Reading. Chapter 4: Performance at the International Benchmarks. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
4. Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the Book: Using TIMSS to Investigate the Translation of Policy into Practice through the World of Textbooks. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0844-0
5. Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building Student Capacity for Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning: An Analysis of Mathematical Tasks Used in Reform Classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455
6. Garcia-Mila, M., Felton, M., Miralda-Banda, A., & Castells, N. (2023). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and predispositions to teach argumentation in their disciplines. Journal of Education for Teaching, 49(4), 648–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2022.2150536
7. Martín-Gámez, C., & Erduran, S. (2018). Understanding argumentation about socio-scientific issues on energy: a quantitative study with primary pre-service teachers in Spain. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(4), 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1427568
8. Qosimova, K., Matchonov, S., G‘ulomova, X., Yo‘ldosheva, Sh., & Sariyev, Sh. (2009). Ona tili o‘qitish metodikasi: darslik. Noshir.
9. Aydarova, U. B., & Azizova, N. K. (2023). O‘qish savodxonligi: umumiy o‘rta ta’lim maktablarining 3-sinfi uchun darslik. III qism. Novda Edutainment.
10. Kuranov, S. D. (2023). Ona tili: umumiy o‘rta ta’lim maktablarining 2-sinfi uchun darslik. III qism. Novda Edutainment.
11. Toirova, M. E. (2023). O‘qish savodxonligi: umumiy o‘rta ta’lim maktablarining 4-sinfi uchun darslik. I qism. Novda Edutainment.
12. Hsieh, H. (2005). -F., Shannon S. E. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 «Maktabgacha va maktab ta’limi» jurnali
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Как цитировать
Страницы
Цитирование