Beyond Accountability: A Growth-Oriented Teacher Appraisal System for Professional Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15553487Аннотация
This article proposes a school-wide, growth-oriented teacher appraisal system (GOAS) designed to improve
instructional quality, teacher motivation, and long-term professional development. In many public schools, current
appraisal practices are largely summative and fail to provide teachers with meaningful feedback. Common evaluation
methods, such as lesson observations and national attestations, do not adequately reflect classroom performance or support
instructional improvement. GOAS addresses this gap by gathering performance data from multiple sources, including
lesson observations, peer-teacher feedback, student and parent input, self-evaluation, and structured leadership conferences.
The proposed framework is formative, evidence-based, and designed to promote a culture of trust, reflection, and
continuous learning. Drawing on international research and practical leadership experience, this article outlines the components,
implementation cycle, and unique advantages of GOAS, and offers a contribution to the rethinking of teacher
appraisal in Uzbekistan and similar education systems.
Ключевые слова
Teacher appraisal, formative evaluation, professional development, school leadership, multi-source feedback, instructional improvement, UzbekistanБиблиографические ссылки
1. Alwaely, S. A., El-Zeiny, M. E., Alqudah, H., Alamarnih, E. F. M., Salman, O. K. I., Halim, M., & Khasawneh, M. A. S.
2. (2023). The impact of teacher evaluation on professional development and student achievement. Revista de Gestão
3. Social e Ambiental, 17(7), 1–11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373285635_The_Impact_of_Teacher_Evaluation_
4. on_Professional_Development_and_Student_Achievement
5. Awiten, M. U., Estose, M. R. C., Daguit, J. P., & Binayao, B. S. (2025). Enhancing teacher performance: A systematic
6. review for performance appraisal methods in education. International Journal of All Research Writings, 6(9), 41–47.
8. appraisal_methods_in_education
9. Danielson, C. (2013). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (3rd ed.). ASCD.
11. Espinosa, M. P., Reomero, J. I., Deguito, P., & Lugatiman, R. (2022). Performance appraisal of teachers in public
12. secondary schools: A systematic review. Davao del Norte State College. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
13. _Performance_Appraisal_of_Teachers_in_Public_Secondary_Schools_A_Systematic_Review
14. Jerrim, J., & Sims, S. (2021). School accountability and teacher stress: International evidence from the OECD TALIS
15. study. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 34, 5–32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
16. _School_accountability_and_teacher_stress_international_evidence_from_the_OECD_TALIS_study
17. OECD. (2013). Teachers for the 21st century: Using evaluation to improve teaching. OECD Publishing.
18. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/teachers-for-the-21st-century_9789264193864-en.html
19. Sims, S., Fletcher-Wood, H., O’Mara-Eves, A., Cottingham, S., Stansfield, C., Goodrich, J., Van Herwegen, J., &
20. Anders, J. (2023). Effective teacher professional development: New theory and a meta-analytic test. Review of Educational
21. Research. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/00346543231217480
22. Unachukwu, G. O., & Orji, F. O. (2021). Relationship between staff performance appraisal and reward practices
23. adopted by principals and teachers’ job productivity in public secondary schools in Anambra State, Nigeria. Unizik
24. Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies, 8, 114–123. https://unijerps.org/index.php/unijerps/article/download/
25. /212/469
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2025 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Как цитировать
Цитирование