Integrating Google Classroom and Project-Based Learning for Enhanced Synchronous and Asynchronous Education.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17296940Аннотация
This article examines the use of Google Classroom in education and its potential to combine synchronous (realtime)
and asynchronous (self-paced) learning. Particular attention is given to the integration of Project-Based Learning
(PBL) with Google Classroom, highlighting its effectiveness, benefits, and challenges. The findings suggest that the
hybrid learning model reduces rigidity, fosters student engagement, motivation, and achievement, and proves especially
effective in English as a Second Language (ESL) education.
Ключевые слова
Google Classroom, Project-Based Learning (PBL), synchronous learning, asynchronous learning, ESL education, student engagement, online learning, digital tools, hybrid learning, collaborative learning, reflective practices, educational technology, digital literacy, learning outcomes, student motivation, virtual classroom, interactive learning, real-time communication, flexible learning environmentБиблиографические ссылки
1. 1. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating Project-Based
2. Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398.
3. 2. Burnett, C., Merchant, G., Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2018). The Case of the Digital Literacies Project: An Example of
4. Effective Classroom Practice. Literacy, 52(3), 174–182.
5. 3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
6. 4. Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study.
7. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75–88.
8. 5. Friska, E. (2021). Student Perceptions of Google Classroom as a Blended Learning Tool in University Education.
9. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 14(2), 1–15.
10. 6. Glazunova, O., Kudryashova, A., Ivanova, E., & Mukhacheva, O. (2023). Enhancing Student Engagement in Online
11. Learning: The Role of Google Classroom. Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 23–34.
12. 7. Goldin, I., & Katz, L. F. (2012). The Race Between Education and Technology. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
13. 8. Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-Service Teachers’ Implementation and Understanding
14. of STEM Project-Based Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63–76.
15. 9. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
16. 10. Hipitronic, D., Sharma, R., & Novak, M. (2022). Digital Literacy Training for Educators: Bridging the Gap in Online
17. Education. Journal of Online Learning Research, 7(2), 123–140.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2025 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Как цитировать
Цитирование