Digital Reading vs. Print Reading: Effects on EFL Learners’ Reading Speed and Understanding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17622951Ключевые слова:
digital reading; print reading; reading comprehension; reading speed; EFL learners; digital literacy; screenbased reading; cognitive processing; language learningАннотация
This article examines the comparative effects of digital and print reading on English as a Foreign Language
(EFL) learners’ reading speed and comprehension. As digital technologies increasingly dominate educational contexts,
understanding how different reading modes influence learning outcomes has become crucial. The article aims to determine
whether screen-based reading enhances or hinders comprehension and speed compared to traditional print reading
among intermediate-level EFL students. The study employs a quasi-experimental design involving two groups: one using
digital texts and the other using printed materials, followed by comprehension tests and timed reading assessments. Data
are analyzed using quantitative methods to identify significant differences between the groups
Библиографические ссылки
1. Adora, R. M. (2024). Reading comprehension and academic performance. International Journal of Science and
Research Archive, 11(2), 1–15.
2. Nurjanah, R. L., & Putri, S. R. (2023). The effect of literal comprehension on the higher levels of comprehension in
reading skill: A longitudinal case study.
3. Onel, N., & Durdukoca, S. F. (2021). The relationship between reading habits and academic achievement in secondary
school students. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(2), 134–147.
4. Hoover, W. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (2022). Cognitive processes in reading comprehension: A comprehensive overview.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 1–15.
5. Loschky, L. C., Larson, A. M., Smith, T. J., & Magliano, J. P. (2023). Construction or updating? Event model processes
during visual narrative comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(6), 2424–2440.
6. Baron, N. S. (2021). How we read now: Strategic choices for print, screen, and audio. Oxford University Press. https://
doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190084097.001.0001
7. Chen, H. (2019). Digital reading and EFL learners’ reading comprehension: The role of multimedia and motivation.
Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 713–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1535512
8. Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis
on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
9. Jeong, H. (2012). A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye
fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library, 30(3), 390–408. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471211241663
10. Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects
on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijer.2012.12.002
11. Anderson, N. J. (2019). Integration with other language skills. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language
Teaching (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons.
12. Edwards, L. (2023, March 13). What is ReadWorks and how does it work? Best tips and tricks. https://www.techlearning.
com/how-to/what-is-readworks-and-how-does-it-work-best-tips-and-tricks
13. Dunifa, L. (2023). Factors affecting students’ reading anxiety in EFL teaching and learning. English Education Journal,
55–63.
14. Kesson, H. (2020). Reading digital texts: Obstacles to using digital resources. English Teaching Practice & Critique,
19(2), 155–168.
15. Zhang, J. (2023). EFL teachers’ digital literacy: The role of contextual factors in their literacy development. Frontiers
in Psychology, 14, 1153339.
16. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive
emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.
17. Сарсенбаева, З. (2024). Modernism in Uzbek literature and interpretation of images. Зарубежная лингвистика и
лингводидактика, 2(1), 193–199.
18. Сарсенбаева, З. (2023). Analysis of images and symbols in English non-realistic works. Ренессанс в парадигме
новаций образования и технологий в XXI веке, 1(1), 229–232.
19. Сарсбаева, З. (2024). Модернизм в узбекской литературе и интерпретация образов. Зарубежная лингвистика и
лингводидактика, 2(1), 193–199.
20. Sarsenbaeva, Z. (2024). Descriptions of imagery, symbolism, and non-realistic elements. Conference Proceedings:
Fostering Your Research Spirit, 409–414.
21. Сарсенбаева, З. (2022). Лингвокультурологический анализ культуры каракалпаков в пословицах. Общество и
инновации, 3(8/S), 39–42.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2025 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
