Masofaviy ta’lim jarayonida odam anatomiyasi va fiziologiyasi fanini o‘qitish: imkoniyatlar, cheklovlar va istiqbollar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17718970Ключевые слова:
masofaviy ta’lim, anatomiya, fiziologiya, raqamli pedagogika, tibbiy ta’lim, aralash ta’lim, virtual ta’lim texnologiyalari.Аннотация
Ushbu maqolada masofaviy ta’lim sharoitida odam anatomiyasi va fiziologiyasi fanini o‘qitishning nazariy
va amaliy jihatlari tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqot xalqaro va mahalliy tajriba asosida masofaviy ta’limning pedagogik, texnologik
va didaktik xususiyatlarini ko‘rib chiqadi. Maqolada an’anaviy va masofaviy ta’lim metodlarining qiyosiy tahlili, raqamli
vositalarning samaradorligi va ularning cheklovlari muhokama qilinadi. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko‘rsatadiki, masofaviy
ta’lim nazariy bilimlarni yetkazishda samarali bo‘lsada, amaliy ko‘nikmalarni shakllantirishda aralash ta’lim (blended
learning) modeli maqsadga muvofiqroq hisoblanadi.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Achike, F. I., & Nain, N. (2015). Evaluating the use of virtual biochemistry laboratory in enhancing students’ performance.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 968–976.
2. Bączek, M., Zagańczyk-Bączek, M., Szpringer, M., Jaroszyński, A., & Wożakowska-Kapłon, B. (2021). Students’ perception
of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medicine, 100(7), e24821.
3. Chen, F., & Jones, D. (2007). Teaching basic surgical skills using online video demonstrations. Journal of Surgical
Education, 64(4), 203–208.
4. Estai, M., & Bunt, S. (2016). Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Annals of Anatomy, 208,
151–157.
5. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R.
Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer.
6. Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564–569.
7. Kay, R. H. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers
in Human Behavior, 28(3), 820–831.
8. Khot, Z., Quinlan, K., Norman, G. R., & Wainman, B. (2013). The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional
resources for education in anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 6(4), 211–215.
9. Limniou, M., Roberts, D., & Papadopoulos, N. (2009). Full immersive virtual environment CAVE™ in chemistry education.
Computers & Education, 51(2), 584–593.
10. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
11. McGarr, O., & Johnston, K. (2021). Exploring the evolution of educational technology policy in Ireland: From catching
up to pedagogical innovation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1983–2004.
12. Petersson, H., Sinkvist, D., Wang, C., & Smedby, Ö. (2009). Web-based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for
improved anatomy learning. Anatomical Sciences Education, 2(2), 61–68.
13. Provo, J., Lamar, C., & Newby, T. (2002). Using a cross section to train veterinary anatomy: Impact of spatial skills on
learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 967–981.
14. Rowe, M., Frantz, J., & Bozalek, V. (2012). The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students:
A systematic review. Medical Teacher, 34(4), e216–e221.
15. Sugand, K., Abrahams, P., & Khurana, A. (2010). The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anatomical
Sciences Education, 3(2), 83–93.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2025 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
