A System of Software that Develops the Intellectual Potential of Students in Teaching Mathematics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18028616Ключевые слова:
intellectual potential, mathematics education, digital tools, GeoGebra, Desmos, metacognition, motivationАннотация
The rapid integration of digital technologies into mathematics education has significantly expanded opportunities
for enhancing students’ intellectual potential, particularly in cognitive, emotional, and metacognitive domains. This
study explores a system of software tools that support students’ intellectual development in mathematics learning at the
secondary school level. Using an analytical and descriptive research design, widely applied international platforms such
as GeoGebra, Desmos, Padlet, Kahoot, Mentimeter, and Google Classroom are comparatively analyzed, and their role in
fostering higher-order thinking skills, creativity, problem-solving abilities, motivation, and self-regulation is evaluated. The
findings demonstrate that a structured combination of dynamic visualization tools, collaborative learning environments,
and assessment technologies makes a substantial contribution to students’ intellectual growth. The study also proposes
an integrated software system tailored to mathematics instruction in Uzbekistan’s Presidential Schools, grounded in
international best practices
Библиографические ссылки
1. Bruner, J. S. (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Dinsmore, D. L., & Parkinson, M. M. (2013). What are metacognition and self-regulated learning? Educational Psychology
Review, 25(3), 293–315.
3. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American
Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
4. Hegedus, S. J., & Kaput, J. (2004). An introduction to the profound potential of connected algebra activities: Issues
of representation, engagement, and pedagogy. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3),
197–220
5. Hegedus, S. J., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2009). Interconnected mathematical representations: Transforming classroom
practice with digital technologies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 199–215.
6. Kahoot! (2024). Using gamification for formative assessment in mathematics classrooms. Oslo: Kahoot Learning
Reports.
7. Mentimeter (2023). Interactive learning and student engagement: Global education study. Stockholm: Mentimeter
Academic Insights.
8. Padlet (2022). Collaborative learning research report. San Francisco: Padlet Technologies.
9. Polly, D., McGee, J. R., & Wang, C. (2020). Digital tools and mathematics teaching: A systematic review of the literature.
Journal of Computers in Education, 7(3), 415–436.
10. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in
mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 334–370). New
York: Macmillan.
11. Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (2014). Assessing Mathematical Literacy: The PISA Experience. Springer.
12. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
13. Zawilinski, L., & Leatham, K. R. (2021). Teachers’ use of dynamic mathematics software to enhance student reasoning.
Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 23(2), 45–65.
14. Zhang, D., Trussell, R., Gallegos, B., & Asam, R. (2015). Using online tools to support mathematics learning: Effects
on student engagement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 237–249.
15. Google Classroom (2023). Enhancing feedback and reflective learning in digital classrooms. Mountain View, CA:
Google for Education.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2025 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
