Metodik savodxonlikni rivojlantirishning pedagogik va metodologik jihatlari (Biologiya fani misolida).
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19665793Ключевые слова:
metodik savodxonlik, pedagogik kompetentlik, o‘qituvchi tayyorlash, metodologik yondashuv, refleksiv ta’lim, professional rivojlanish, didaktik malakalar.Аннотация
Ushbu maqolada metodik savodxonlikni rivojlantirishning pedagogik va metodologik jihatlari keng qamrovli
tahlil qilinadi. Zamonaviy ta’lim tizimida o‘qituvchilarning metodik savodxonligi professional kompetentlikning muhim
tarkibiy qismi sifatida ko‘rib chiqiladi. Maqolada metodik savodxonlik tushunchasining mohiyati, uni shakllantirishga
ta’sir etuvchi omillar, pedagogik va metodologik yondashuvlar hamda xalqaro va mahalliy tajribalar qiyosiy tahlil asosida
o‘rganiladi. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko‘rsatadiki, metodik savodxonlikni rivojlantirish uchun tizimli, refleksiv va amaliyotga
yo‘naltirilgan yondashuvlarning uyg‘unligi zarurdir. Maqola 15 dan ortiq ilmiy manba tahlilini o‘z ichiga oladi.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of
Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
2. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8),
3–15.
3. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational
Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.
4. Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher
preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–272.
5. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–
314.
6. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should
learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. European Commission. (2012). Supporting the teaching professions for better learning outcomes. Commission Staff
Working Document. Strasbourg: EC.
8. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching.
Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
9. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers
College Press.
11. Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2013). Challenges to teacher resilience: Conditions count. British Educational Research Journal,
39(1), 22–44.
12. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge.
Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
13. Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York:
Teachers College Press.
14. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
15. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1),
1–22.
16. UNESCO. (2016). Education for people and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all. Paris: UNESCO.
17. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Vazirlar Mahkamasi. (2022). 2022–2026 yillarga mo‘ljallangan ta’lim sohasini rivojlantirish
davlat dasturi. Toshkent: O‘zRV.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
