Principles of Multilevel Assessment in Speaking

Авторы

  • Shohida Billayeva Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20390329

Ключевые слова:

multilevel assessment, speaking skills, communicative competence, formative assessment, language proficiency, criterion-based assessment

Аннотация

The principles of multilevel assessment in speaking skills within foreign language education are explored. The
study focuses on assessing learners with different language proficiency levels through communicative, criterion-based,
and formative assessment approaches. The effectiveness of multilevel assessment in improving learners’ speaking fluency,
accuracy, interaction, and confidence is analyzed. The findings indicate that differentiated speaking assessment
enhances learners’ communicative competence and provides teachers with more objective evaluation opportunities

Биография автора

  • Shohida Billayeva

    Master’s Student, Shahrisabz State Pedagogical Institute

Библиографические ссылки

1. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford University Press.

2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.

3. Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. Pearson Education.

4. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and

Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.

5. Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press.

6. Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing Speaking. Cambridge University Press.

7. Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge University Press.

8. Thornbury, S. (2005). How to Teach Speaking. Pearson Longman.

9. Weir, C. J. (2005). Language Testing and Validation. Palgrave Macmillan.

10. Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded Formative Assessment. Solution Tree Press.

Опубликован

2026-05-18

Как цитировать

Principles of Multilevel Assessment in Speaking. (2026). MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20390329