Sun’iy intellektga qaramlik: raqamli addiksiya evolyutsiyasining yangi bosqichi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20815206Ключевые слова:
sun’iy intellektga qaramlik, raqamli addiksiya, kognitiv tayanish, kognitiv offloading, emotsional bog‘lanish, kompulsiv foydalanish, algoritmik moslashuv, diagnostik indikatorlar, strukturaviy model, tanqidiy fikrlash.Аннотация
Maqolada sun’iy intellektga qaramlik zamonaviy raqamli addiksiyalarning yangi va murakkab shakli sifatida
tahlil qilinadi. Unda SI qaramligining mazmuni, diagnostik indikatorlari hamda kognitiv, emotsional, xulq-atvoriy va algoritmik-
kommunikativ komponentlardan iborat strukturaviy modeli yoritiladi. Tadqiqotda sun’iy intellekt vositalariga haddan
tashqari tayanish mustaqil fikrlash, tanqidiy tahlil, emotsional regulyatsiya va real ijtimoiy muloqot jarayonlariga salbiy
ta’sir ko‘rsatishi mumkinligi asoslanadi. Shuningdek, SI qaramligining klassik internet, smartfon va o‘yin qaramligidan
farqli jihatlari ochib beriladi.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Mirziyoyev, Sh. M. (2024, 13-avgust). Sun’iy intellekt va startap loyihalarni rivojlantirish bo‘yicha taqdimot o‘tkazildi.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti rasmiy veb-sayti. https://president.uz/oz/lists/view/7464
2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining Qarori. (2024, 14-oktyabr). Sun’iy intellekt texnologiyalarini 2030-yilga qadar
rivojlantirish strategiyasini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida PQ-358-son. https://lex.uz/docs/-7158604
3. Zhang, X., Yin, M., Zhang, M., Li, Z., & Li, H. (2025). The development and validation of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot
Dependence Scale. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 28(2), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1089/
cyber.2024.0240
4. Yu, S.-C., Chen, H.-R., & Yang, Y.-W. (2024). Development and validation of the Problematic ChatGPT Use Scale: A
preliminary report. Current Psychology, 43, 26080–26092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06259-z
5. Maral, S. (2025). Problematic ChatGPT Use Scale: AI-human collaboration or unraveling the dark side of ChatGPT.
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-025-01509-y
6. Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies,
15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
7. Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities:
A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
8. Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
9. Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information
at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776-778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
10. Dror, I. E., & Harnad, S. (2008). Offloading cognition onto cognitive technology. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.3569
11. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2),
230-253. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886
12. Buçinca, Z., Malaya, M. B., & Gajos, K. Z. (2021). To trust or to think: Cognitive forcing functions can reduce overreliance
on AI in AI-assisted decision-making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1),
1-21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449287
13. Alon-Barkat, S., & Busuioc, M. (2023). Human-AI interactions in public sector decision-making: “Automation bias” and
“selective adherence” to algorithmic advice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 153–169.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac007
14. Klein, S. H., Rupp, M. A., & Shanteau, J. (2025). The effects of human-like social cues on social responses towards
text-based conversational agents: A meta-analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article
1459. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05618-w
15. Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues,
56(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153
16. Griffiths, M. D. (2005). A “components” model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance
Use, 10(4), 191-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659890500114359
17. Brand, M., Young, K. S., & Laier, C. (2014). Prefrontal control and Internet addiction: A theoretical model and review
of neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 375. https://doi.
org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00375
18. Brand, M., Wegmann, E., Stark, R., Müller, A., Wölfling, K., Robbins, T. W., & Potenza, M. N. (2019). The Interaction of
Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: Update, generalization to addictive behaviors
beyond Internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors. Neuroscience &
Biobehavioral Reviews, 104, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.032
19. American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Internet gaming. Psychiatry.org. https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/
internet-gaming
20. World Health Organization. (2020). Addictive behaviours: Gaming disorder. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/
frequently-asked-questions/gaming-disorder
21. Pontes, H. M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Measuring DSM-5 Internet Gaming Disorder: Development and validation of
a short psychometric scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.006
22. Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014). Internet addiction: A systematic review of epidemiological research for the last
decade. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 20(25), 4026-4052. https://doi.org/10.2174/13816128113199990617
23. Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(3),
237-244. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237
24. Pontes, H. M., Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Clinical psychology of Internet addiction: A review of its conceptualization,
prevalence, neuronal processes, and implications for treatment. Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics, 4,
11-23. https://doi.org/10.2147/NAN.S60982
25. Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA - A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man
and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/365153.365168
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
