The Specifics of the Formation of Systems Thinking in Technical Education, Methods and Means of Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21099296Ключевые слова:
systems thinking, technical education, engineering education, systems engineering, project-based learning, digital technologies, systems modeling, interdisciplinary learning, cognitive development, engineering competencies, STEM education, professional trainingАннотация
This paper analyzes the theoretical foundations and pedagogical characteristics of developing systems thinking
in technical education. Particular attention is paid to the educational conditions, teaching methods, and digital tools that
facilitate the development of systems thinking among engineering students. The study emphasizes the role of interdisciplinary
integration, project-based learning, systems modeling, digital simulation, concept mapping, problem-based
learning, and virtual laboratories in enhancing students’ analytical and engineering competencies. A structural framework
describing the relationships among the cognitive, analytical, modeling, and decision-making components of systems
thinking is proposed. The paper concludes that the systematic implementation of modern pedagogical technologies significantly
enhances students’ ability to analyze engineering systems, solve complex technical problems, and make evidence-
based engineering decisions
Библиографические ссылки
1. Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A Definition of Systems Thinking: A Systems Approach. Procedia Computer Science,
44, 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050
2. Frank, M. (2012). Engineering Systems Thinking and Systems Thinking. Systems Engineering, 15(1), 84–94. https://
doi.org/10.1002/sys.20195
3. Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston: McGraw-
Hill.
4. Брушлинский А. В. Субъект: мышление, учение, воображение. М.–Воронеж, 1996. 388 с.
5. Урбански А. Начало с учетом конца... или Какой может быть система образования через 10 лет // Директор
школы. 1994. № 4. С. 79–87.
6. National Academy of Engineering. (2020). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington,
DC: National Academies Press.
7. Prince, M., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2),
123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
8. Litzinger, T., Lattuca, L., Hadgraft, R., & Newstetter, W. (2011). Engineering Education and the Development of Expertise.
Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123–150.
9. Юсупова Л. Ф. (2025). Использование цифровых технологий в развитии системного мышления // ББК 74.58 А43
/ Редакционная коллегия: В. Ш. Мухаметшин, У. М. Турдиалиев. С. 186.
10. Юсупова Л. Ф., Денисова О. А. (2025). Наставничество как актуальное явление в системе современного
образования // ББК 74.58 А43 / Редакционная коллегия: В. Ш. Мухаметшин, У. М. Турдиалиев. С. 181.
11. Atajonova S. B. Methodology of Teaching General Educational Disciplines with a Professional Focus in Technical Universities
// Scientific and Technical Journal “Machine Building” (STJ AndMI).
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
