Model for Improving Students’ Professional Competencies Based on Motivational Learning Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21126711Ключевые слова:
professional competencies, motivational learning, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, Self-Determination Theory (SDT), growth mindset, active learning, collaborative learning, autonomyАннотация
Professional competencies have become one of the key determinants of career success in today’s competitive
and rapidly evolving labor market. Within higher education, these competencies encompass the knowledge, skills,
abilities, and professional behaviors required for effective performance in professional settings. As higher education
institutions increasingly seek to prepare students for the demands of contemporary workplaces, the motivational learning
approach has emerged as an effective pedagogical strategy for developing professional competencies. By appropriately
integrating intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors, educators can create learning environments that foster active student
engagement, deeper learning, and the successful development of professional competencies. This article proposes
a model for improving students’ professional competencies based on a motivational learning approach that incorporates
the principles of autonomy support, competence development, mastery-oriented goals, and collaborative learning. The
proposed model consists of four interconnected phases–Preparation, Active Engagement, Reflection, and Integration–
designed to promote the continuous development of competencies, provide systematic formative feedback, and facilitate
the application of acquired competencies in authentic professional contexts. Ultimately, this approach encourages students
to develop a growth mindset, strengthen their capacity for self-directed learning, and successfully transition from
academic preparation to professional practice, thereby enhancing their readiness to meet the evolving demands of the
modern labor market.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Al-Harthy, I. S. (2016). Contemporary motivation learning theories: A review. International Journal of Learning Management
Systems, 4, 99–117. https://doi.org/10.18576/ijlms/040205
2. Bieg, S., Beckes, S., & Mittag, W. (2011). The role of intrinsic motivation for teaching, teachers’ care, and autonomy
support in students’ self-determined motivation. Journal of Educational Research Online, 3(1), 122–140. https://doi.
org/10.25656/01:4685
3. Boström, L., & Bostedt, G. (2020). What about study motivation? Students’ and teachers’ perspectives on factors
affecting study motivation. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(8), 40–59. https://
doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.3
4. Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment
& Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
5. Dweck, C. S., & Molden, D. C. (2017). Mindsets: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In A. J. Elliot,
C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (2nd ed., pp.
135–154). Guilford Press.
6. Gopalan, V., Bakar, J. A. A., Zulkifli, A. N., Alwi, A., & Mat, R. C. (2017). A review of the motivation theories in learning.
020043. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5005376
7. Makulova, A. T., Alimzhanova, G. M., Bekturganova, Z. M., Umirzakova, Z. A., Makulova, L. T., & Karymbayeva, K. M.
(2015). Theory and practice of competency-based approach in education.(8), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.
v8n8p183
8. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2018). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development,
and wellness. Guilford Press.
9. Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation.(3–4), 207 https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653
133
10. Steinmayr, R., Weidinger, A. F., Schwinger, M., & Spinath, B. (2019). The importance of students’ motivation for their
academic achievement: Replicating and extending previous findings. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1730. https://
doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01730
11. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.