Xotin-qizlarda emotsional defitsit va nikohdan tashqari munosabatlar o‘rtasidagi bog‘liqlikning ijtimoiy-psixologik xususiyatlari
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22193135Ключевые слова:
xotin-qizlar, emotsional defitsit, nikoh, nikohdan tashqari munosabatlar, emotsional yaqinlik, oilaviy munosabatlar, ijtimoiy qo‘llab-quvvatlash, yolg‘izlik, nikohdan qoniqish, ijtimoiy-psixologik omillar.Аннотация
Mazkur maqolada xotin-qizlarda emotsional defitsit va nikohdan tashqari munosabatlarga moyillik o‘rtasidagi
bog‘liqlikning ijtimoiy-psixologik xususiyatlari tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotning asosiy maqsadi oilaviy munosabatlarda
emotsional ehtiyojlarning qondirilmasligi, turmush o‘rtoqlar o‘rtasidagi emotsional yaqinlikning pasayishi, ijtimoiy
qo‘llab-quvvatlash yetishmovchiligi hamda nikohdan tashqari emotsional yoki romantik munosabatlarga moyillik o‘rtasidagi
o‘zaro aloqani aniqlashdan iborat. Tadqiqotda so‘rovnoma, psixodiagnostik metodikalar, korrelyatsion va qiyosiy
tahlil usullaridan foydalanish taklif etiladi. Maqolada emotsional defitsitning asosiy tarkibiy qismlari sifatida emotsional
yaqinlikning yetishmasligi, e’tibor va qo‘llab-quvvatlashga ehtiyoj, yolg‘izlik hissi, muloqotdan qoniqmaslik va munosabatlardagi
emotsional sovuqlik ko‘rib chiqiladi. Tahlil natijalari emotsional ehtiyojlarning muntazam ravishda qondirilmasligi
nikohdan tashqari munosabatlarga moyillikning oshishi bilan bog‘liq bo‘lishi mumkinligini ko‘rsatadi. Shu bilan birga,
mazkur bog‘liqlikni faqat individual omillar bilan emas, balki oilaviy muloqot, ijtimoiy qo‘llab-quvvatlash, nikohdan qoniqish
va jamiyatdagi gender me’yorlari bilan kompleks ravishda izohlash zarurligi asoslanadi.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Bowlby J. A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. – London: Routledge, 1988. –
224 p.
2. Gottman J. M., Silver N. The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. – New York: Harmony Books, 2015. – 288 p.
3. Hazan C., Shaver P. Romantic Love Conceptualized as an Attachment Process // Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology. – Washington, 1987. – Vol. 52. – № 3. – P. 511–524.
4. Reis H. T., Shaver P. Intimacy as an Interpersonal Process // Handbook of Personal Relationships / Ed. by S. Duck. –
Chichester: Wiley, 1988. – P. 367–389.
5. Rusbult C. E., Martz J. M., Agnew C. R. The Investment Model Scale: Measuring Commitment Level, Satisfaction
Level, Quality of Alternatives, and Investment Size // Personal Relationships. – 1998. – Vol. 5. – № 4. – P. 357–391.
6. Glass S. P., Wright T. L. Justifications for Extramarital Relationships: The Association between Attitudes, Behaviors,
and Gender // Journal of Sex Research. – 1992. – Vol. 29. – № 3. – P. 361–387.
7. Atkins D. C., Baucom D. H., Jacobson N. S. Understanding Infidelity: Correlates in a National Random Sample //
Journal of Family Psychology. – 2001. – Vol. 15. – № 4. – P. 735–749.
8. Allen E. S., Atkins D. C., Baucom D. H., Snyder D. K., Gordon K. C., Glass S. P. Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and
Contextual Factors in Engaging in and Responding to Extramarital Involvement // Clinical Psychology: Science and
Practice. – 2005. – Vol. 12. – № 2. – P. 101–130.
9. Fincham F. D., May R. W. Infidelity in Romantic Relationships // Current Opinion in Psychology. – 2017. – Vol. 13. – P.
70–74.
10. Levinger G. A Social Psychological Perspective on Marital Dissolution // Journal of Social Issues. – 1979. – Vol. 35. –
№ 4. – P. 21–47.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
