SHAXS TEXNOLOGIK TAFAKKURI FENOMENINING FALSAFIY-ANTROPOLOGIK VA GNOSEOLOGIK TALQINI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23588168Аннотация
Mazkur maqolada shaxs texnologik tafakkuri fenomeni falsafiy-antropologik va gnoseologik nuqtai nazardan tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotda “texnologik tafakkur” tushunchasining falsafiy-tarixiy genezisi Aristotel, F. Bekon, R. Dekart, I. Kant, J. Dyui, L. Vigotskiy, S. Papert va J. M. Wing g‘oyalari asosida yoritiladi. Inson va texnologiya munosabatining uch paradigmasi - instrumental, deterministik va plyuralistik - hamda texnologik tafakkurning antropologik funksiyalari (identifikatsiya, transformatsiya, ijtimoiy integratsiya) ko‘rib chiqiladi. Shuningdek, texnologik tafakkurning gnoseologik asoslari empirizm, ratsionalizm va konstruktivizm tizimlari nuqtai nazaridan tahlil qilinib, Wing (2006) kompyutatsion tafakkur komponentlarining gnoseologik mosligi ko‘rsatib beriladi. Tadqiqot natijalari o‘yin konstruktorlari vositasida o‘quvchilarda texnologik tafakkurni shakllantirish metodologiyasini falsafiy jihatdan asoslashga xizmat qiladi.Ключевые слова
texnologik tafakkur, falsafiy antropologiya, gnoseologiya, konstruktivizm, kompyutatsion tafakkur, o‘yin konstruktorlari, ta’lim falsafasi, kognitiv rivojlanishБиблиографические ссылки
1. Dyui, J. (1938). Tajriba va ta’lim (Experience and Education). - 1938.
2. Vigotskiy, L. S. (1934). Fikr va til (Myshlenie i rech’). - 1934.
3. Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education. -, 72, 145–157.
4. Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the.
5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). (eds.) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. - Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2000 (qayta nashr - 2020). National Academies Press.
6. Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher. -, 42(1), 38–43.
7. Hattie, J., & Yates, G. (2014). Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. - London: Routledge, 2014. Routledge.
8. Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to Solve Problems: A Handbook for Designing Problem-Solving Learning Environments. - New York: Routledge, 2011. Routledge.
9. Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2015). Constructionist gaming: Understanding the benefits of making games for learning. Educational Psychologist. -, 50(4), 313–334.
10. Lindh, J., & Holgersson, T. (2007). Does LEGO training stimulate pupils’ ability to solve logical problems?. Computers & Education. -, 49(4), 1097–1111.
11. Toshpulatova, F. (2025). O‘quvchilarning innovatsion ta’lim muhitida tayanch kompetensiyalarini shakllantirishning dolzarbligi. Maktabgacha va maktabgacha ta’lim. -.
12. Ng, W., Liu, M., & Cui, Z. (n.d.). Technology and student identity formation: a review. manba aniqlashtirishni talab qiladi - muallif tomonidan tekshirilishi tavsiya etiladi.
13. Papert, S. (1980). The Gears of My Childhood (Foreword). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. - New York: Basic Books.
14. Resnick, M., & Rosenbaum, E. (2013). Designing for tinkerability. Design, Make, Play: Growing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators / Ed. by M. Honey, D. E. Kanter. - New York: Routledge, 163–181.
15. Sawyer, R. K. (2014). (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. - 2nd ed. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Cambridge University Press.
16. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM. -, 49(3), 33–35.
17. Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. -, 366(1881), 3717–3725.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 «Maktabgacha va maktab ta’limi» jurnali
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Как цитировать
Страницы
Цитирование