Texnika va iqtisodiyot yo‘nalishidagi oliy ta’lim muassasalari talabalarida ingliz tilini mustaqil o‘rganishning psixologik-pedagogik xususiyatlari
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21165806Ключевые слова:
ingliz tili, mustaqil o‘rganish, psixologik-pedagogik xususiyatlar, motivatsiya, ESP, oliy ta’limАннотация
Ushbu maqolada texnika va iqtisodiyot yo‘nalishidagi oliy ta’lim muassasalari talabalarining ingliz tilini
mustaqil o‘rganishining psixologik-pedagogik xususiyatlari ilmiy adabiyotlar tahlili asosida o‘rganilgan. Mustaqil ta’lim
jarayoniga ta’sir etuvchi kognitiv, motivatsion, emotsional va pedagogik omillar tahlil qilinib, ularning o‘zaro bog‘liqligi yoritilgan.
Shuningdek, English for Specific Purposes (ESP) yondashuvi, o‘z-o‘zini boshqarish, o‘z-o‘zini samarali baholash
(self-efficacy) hamda kasbiy motivatsiyaning mustaqil til o‘rganishdagi ahamiyati asoslab berilgan. Tadqiqot natijalari texnika
va iqtisodiyot yo‘nalishidagi talabalar uchun ingliz tilini mustaqil o‘rganishni samarali tashkil etishga xizmat qiluvchi
psixologik-pedagogik tavsiyalarni ishlab chiqish uchun metodik asos bo‘lib xizmat qiladi.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2019-yil 20-noyabrdagi PQ-4507-son “Oliy taʼlim muassasalarida xorijiy
tillarni oʻqitish sifatini oshirish chora-tadbirlari toʻgʻrisida”gi Qarori. https://lex.uz/docs/-4613683
2. Bacon, S. M. (1992). The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and
affective response in foreign language listening. Modern Language Journal, 76(2), 160–178.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman.
4. Bekleyen, N. (2009). Struggling with a foreign language: What do university students experience? European Journal
of Teacher Education, 32(4), 407–426.
5. Belcher, D. D. (2009). What ESP is and can be: An introduction. In D. D. Belcher (Ed.), English for Specific Purposes
in Theory and Practice (pp. 1–20). University of Michigan Press.
6. Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning. Jossey-Bass.
7. Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA Handbook: Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language
Learning Approach. Addison-Wesley.
8. Chavez, M. (2001). Gender in the Language Classroom. McGraw-Hill.
9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row.
10. Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and Researching Motivation (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
11. Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-disciplinary
Approach. Cambridge University Press.
12. Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education,
78(7), 674–681.
13. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.
14. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning. Newbury House.
15. Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1),
18–33.
16. Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Pergamon Press.
17. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal,
70(2), 125–132.
18. Hurd, S. (2006). Towards a better understanding of the dynamic role of the distance language learner. Language
Teaching Research, 10(4), 379–403.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
