O‘zbekiston umumta’lim maktablarida mazmun va til integratsiyalashgan o‘qitish (CLIL) yondashuvining pedagogik va amaliy imkoniyatlari
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16880064Ключевые слова:
mazmun va til integratsiyalashgan o‘qitish, CLIL metodikasi, xorijiy til ta’limi, umumta’lim maktabi, innovatsion yondashuv, 4K modeli (kontent, kommunikatsiya, kognitsiya, madaniyat), metodik tavsiyalarАннотация
Ushbu maqolada CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) – ya’ni mazmun va tilni integratsiyalashgan
holda o‘qitish metodikasi xorijiy tillarni o‘qitishda innovatsion yondashuv sifatida tahlil qilinadi. Unda CLILning
maqsadlari, afzalliklari, xalqaro tajribadagi o‘rni va O‘zbekiston umumta’lim maktablarida qo‘llash imkoniyatlari yoritiladi.
Xususan, CLIL yondashuvi yordamida o‘quvchilarda nafaqat chet tili bo‘yicha kommunikativ kompetensiya, balki fanga
oid bilimlarni ham samarali shakllantirish yo‘llari ko‘rib chiqiladi. Shuningdek, ushbu yondashuvni joriy etishda yuzaga
kelishi mumkin bo‘lgan muammolar va ularni bartaraf etish bo‘yicha metodik tavsiyalar beriladi. Maqola O‘zbekiston ta’lim
tizimi sharoitida CLILni qo‘llashning ijobiy jihatlarini ilmiy-nazariy va amaliy misollar bilan asoslaydi
Библиографические ссылки
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2012-yil 10-dekabrdagi “Chet tillarni o‘rganish tizimini yanada takomillashtirish
chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida”gi PQ–1875-son qarori. https://lex.uz/docs/-2126032
“2022 – 2026-yillarga mo‘ljallangan Yangi O‘zbekistonning taraqqiyot strategiyasi to‘g‘risida”gi O‘zbekiston Respublikasi
Prezidentining 2022-yil 28-yanvardagi PF–60-son Farmoni. https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-5841063
European Commission. (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Brussels:
EURYDICE.
Graddol, D. (2006). English Next. British Council.
Alimova, E.N., Yuldasheva, M.B. (2020). The Implementation of CLIL at Uzbek Secondary Schools as an Educational
Approach. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 2(7), 163–169.
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., Frigols, M.J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL. Macmillan Education.
Marsh, D., Maljers, A., Hartiala, A-K. (2001). Profiling European CLIL Classrooms. University of Jyväskylä.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., Marsh, D. (2010). Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2008). Outcomes and processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Current
research from Europe. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 28, 42–69.
Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE – The European Dimension: Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential. European Commission.
Mehisto, P. (2012). Criteria for producing CLIL learning material. Encuentro, 21, 15–33.
Sylvén, L.K. (2013). CLIL in Sweden – Why does it not work? AILA Review, 26, 77–100.
Banegas, D.L. (2012). Integrating content and language in English language teaching in secondary education: Models,
benefits, and challenges. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 111–136.
Coyle, D. (2006). Developing CLIL: Towards a Theory of Practice. APAC Monographs, 6.
Lasagabaster, D., Sierra, J.M. (2010). Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal,
(4), 367–375.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2025 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
