The Importance of Modern Technologies For Improving Speech Skills of Primary Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15482446Аннотация
The article analyzes the issue of using information technologies to improve English-speaking skills in primary
school students, namely the concept, purpose, types and forms, directions, and prospects of their use. The study
describes the structure of the modern digital educational environment. It also identifies the capabilities of information and
educational technologies in the design and implementation of the educational process, the aspects of their integration at
the current stage of educational development, and their alignment with modern requirements. The authors of the study
emphasize the educational potential of information technologies.
Ключевые слова
information technologies, infocommunication technologies, education, teaching, digital educational environment, speech skills.Библиографические ссылки
1. Aksal, F. A. (2009). Action plan on communication practices: Roles of tutors at EMU Distance Education Institute to
2. overcome social barriers in constructing knowledge. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2),
3. –47.
4. Bialo, E. R., & Sivin-Kachala, J. (1996). The effectiveness of technology in schools: A summary of recent research.
5. School Library Media Quarterly, 25(1), 51–57.
6. Blachowicz, C., Bates, A., Berne, J., Bridgman, T., Chaney, J., & Perney, J. (2009). Technology and at-risk young
7. readers and their classrooms. Reading Psychology, 30(5), 387–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710902733576
8. Carlson, S., & Firpo, J. (2001). Integrating computers into teaching: Findings from a 3-year program in 20 developing
9. countries.
10. C. C., & Ho, H. (2002). Exploring new literacies in online peer-learning environments. Reading Online, 6(1). Retrieved
11. September 10, 2012, from http://www.readingonline.org/newliteracies/lit_index.asp?HREF=choi/index.html
12. Fidaoui, D., Bahous, R., & Bacha, N. N. (2010). CALL in Lebanese elementary ESL writing classrooms. Computer
13. Assisted Language Learning, 23(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221003666248
14. Floyd, R. G., Keith, T. Z., Taub, G. E., & McGrew, K. S. (2007).
15. Horton, J., & Moorman, G. (2009). Teaching and reading the millennial generation through media literacy. Journal of
16. Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(6), 471–481.
17. Choi, I. (n.d.). In Vandervert, L. R., Shavinina, L. V., & Cornell, R. A. (Eds.), Cyber education: The future of distance
18. learning (pp. 85–114). Larchmont, NY: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
19. Iriskulov, A. T. va boshq. Kids English. Pupil’s Book. 2-sinf. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston.
20. Khodjayev, K. K. (2021). The specificity and complexity of the process of learning English. International Journal on
21. Orange Technologies, 3(6), 21–24.
22. Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford University Press.
23. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring second language learners’
24. retention of language-related episodes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 381–409.
25. Thornbury, S. (2005). How to Teach Speaking. Pearson Education.
26. Ur, P. (2012). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge University Press.
27. Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for Task-Based Learning. Longman.
28. Ziyonet.uz – http://www.ziyonet.uz
29. Zayniddinovna, T. G., & Khasanovna, N. M. (2023). Game technologies in teaching. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary
30. Research Journal, 11(6), 384–386.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2025 MAKTABGACHA VA MAKTAB TA’LIMI JURNALI

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
